In Mike Rose’s essay, “Blue-Collar Brilliance,” he
explains the thought of people who work blue-collar jobs are often seen as less
intelligent and not able to keep a job, when they are not. I am not able to
agree or disagree with this statement. I am in a way agreeing and disagreeing.
I agree that blue-collar jobs and workers are not
seen as less intelligent because they work it. There are so many things that
part time worker, whether in retail or as a waiter/waitress, have to do. They
have to solve problems and figure things out. Even if they don’t finish school
or anything, that doesn’t mean that they are less intelligent than people who
finish school and go on to college. In blue-collar jobs, you have to be able to
solve problems and figure things out that no one could figure out. You have to
take a step up. You may not have finished school and work in a diner, but that
doesn’t mean you’re not smart.
I also disagree because even though there are many
things that people who don’t have full time jobs or don’t work for a business
are still smart, that doesn’t mean the people who finished school and kept
going on through college deserve what they have. If you had finished school
through everything and went on through school with a determination to get into
a white collar job, you deserve it.
There are many ways to see this. People that are
determined to get a good paying job should go after it, but that doesn’t meant
that people who work blue-collar jobs don’t deserve it or aren’t smart enough
to earn it.
I neither agree or disagree to his proposition. I am
more indifferent to the idea.
I can see how you both agree and disagree, and I appreciate the reasoning you provide. Have you considered that Rose is trying to change not the perception of white collar jobs, but that of blue collar jobs. Should those who work in a physical position such as on an assembly line, be given credit for not just their physical labor, but for their insight and problem solving as well?
ReplyDelete